AgentVFS
People
Toolathlon

detect-revised-terms

Read new_law.pdf and a set of case judgment documents, and identify every cited clause whose substantive content differs from the corresponding provision in the new law — changes to the rule, scope, condition or legal effect. Clauses merely renumbered or relocated do not count, and only clauses the judgment actually quotes are in scope.

Task Prompt

Please help me read new_law.pdf and each case judgment document, identify any cited clauses whose substantive content differs from the corresponding provision in the new law, including changes, additions, or deletions to the legal rule, scope, condition, or legal effect. Do not include clauses that were merely renumbered, relocated, or carried over into the new law without substantive content changes. Only consider clauses where the judgment document quotes or reproduces the original legal text; do not include clauses that are merely cited by article number without the original clause text. For the original quoted content field, copy the text exactly as quoted or reproduced in the judgment document. For the new-law content field, quote the complete corresponding legal provision from new_law.pdf, not a summary or partial excerpt. If one original clause corresponds to multiple new-law clauses, list each correspondence as a separate row. Each PDF may involve one or more legal clause(s) that needs amendment. Based on your analysis, generate a list of legal clauses in the judgment documents that need to be amended, and return the results in the following format:
```
案件文件名称,判决文书中的原始条款,原始引用内容,新法条款,新法条款内容
"case1.pdf","《xx法》第xx条（第xx款）","xxx","《民法典》第xx条（第xx款）","xxx"
```
Finally, please write the returned content into the `revised_terms.csv` file.